Erratum to: Multiple imputation is better than KDIGO guidelines for estimating unknown baseline renal function
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Erratum to: Multiple imputation is better than KDIGO guidelines for estimating unknown baseline renal function
© 2016 Jamme and Geri. Open Access This a International License (http://creativecommons reproduction in any medium, provided you g the Creative Commons license, and indicate if (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/ze • We accept pre-submission inquiries • Our selector tool helps you to find the most relevant journal • We provide round the clock customer support • Convenient online submissio...
متن کاملMultiple Imputation: Better than Single Imputation in Pain Studies?
Missing data is one of the genuine challenges we face during analysis of clinical trials. The main impact of missing data is that it can infuse bias in results which reduces the chance of getting the appropriate interpretation. Hence proper knowledge of techniques for handling missing data is crucial. A common method of handling this problem is by imputing missing values. There can be single or...
متن کاملNew renal guidelines; is more better?
anaemia management in predialysis chronic kidney disease. J Ren Care 2009; 35(Suppl. 2): 29–31 10. Wilson PD, Hutchings A, Jeans A et al. An analysis of the health service efficiency and patient experience with two different intravenous iron preparations in a UK anaemia clinic. J Med Econ 2013; 16: 108–114 11. Bager P, Dahlerup JF. The health care cost of intravenous iron treatment in IBD patie...
متن کاملTotal Knee Replacement Sizing: Shoe Size Is a Better Predictor for Implant Size than Body Height
Background: Various sizes of implants need to be available during surgery. The purpose of this paper is to comparebody height and shoe size with implant sizes in patients who underwent total knee replacement surgery to see whichbiomarker is a better predictor for preoperative planning to determine implant size.Methods: A total of 100 knees, belonging to 50 females and 50 males, were observed. P...
متن کاملIs using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
BACKGROUND Missing outcomes can seriously impair the ability to make correct inferences from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Complete case (CC) analysis is commonly used, but it reduces sample size and is perceived to lead to reduced statistical efficiency of estimates while increasing the potential for bias. As multiple imputation (MI) methods preserve sample size, they are generally view...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Critical Care
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1317-2